| |
|
Thanks to Hugh O'Donnell for working up
these statistics.
The United States' Circumcision Century
(by Hugh O’Donnell, April 2001)
Male genital mutilation has been
practiced by many unrelated cultures over many thousands of years, so it
was by no means a novel idea for America to adopt it. However, it was
certainly an incongruous development given that America was clearly the
world's leader in science in the 20th century. Mutilation of
the genitals, male or female, is always rooted in superstitious beliefs.
America's embrace of circumcision represents a triumph for superstition
over science.
America cherishes the rights of
individual citizens perhaps more than any other nation on Earth.
Removing any part of a newborn's body (or the body of a child of any
age) without compelling medical justification is a clear and breach of
that individual's rights. It is extraordinary that America, while
bearing the torch of freedom for the world, while ensuring the survival
of human rights in the world, should turn a blind eye to this
mutilation.
During 20th century, more than 120
million foreskins were severed from American penises, more than in any
other country in the world. At the height of the circumcision frenzy, a
foreskin was being sundered, and a penis crippled, every 17 seconds.
Whatever other name one might give the
20th century in respect of America, the appellation "The
Circumcision Century" is particularly fitting. Although male
circumcision was not made compulsory by law, parents who wanted their
sons to grow up complete were either not asked or where browbeaten until
they gave in. The history of newborn circumcision in America is quite
well documented; but the equally unsavory history of premature
retraction and circumcision or older children has received much less
attention.
Many confuse the newborn circumcision
rate with the completely different statistic of what percentage of
living males have been circumcised. The two figures are different; for
example, the newborn circumcision rate in Australia is about 10%, but
close to 50% of all living males in Australia have been circumcised.
The question as to what percentage of
living males in the US have been circumcised is answered in the analysis
below, using data in Wallerstein's book, Circumcision: An American
Health Fallacy. Wallerstein states that the data, "If anything,
errs on the side of caution…." Indeed it is easier to make a case
that the newborn circumcision rates presented by Wallerstein
underestimate the true rates than overestimate them. With that in mind,
the results below may also be underestimates.
Table
1: Intact and Circumcised Male Populations
of the USA by Year, 1900 to 2000
|
|
Male population (millions)
|
|
For 5 year period Commencing with Year
|
|
Year
|
Intact
|
Circumcised
|
Total
|
Circumcised
(%)
|
Male
Births
(millions)
|
Newborn
Circumcision
Rate (%)
|
Newborn
Circumcisions
(millions)
|
Non-newborn
Circumcision
(millions)
|
|
1900
|
30
|
7
|
37
|
18
|
5.1
|
30
|
1.5
|
0.3
|
|
1905
|
33
|
8
|
41
|
20
|
5.6
|
35
|
2.0
|
0.3
|
|
1910
|
35
|
10
|
45
|
22
|
6.6
|
42
|
2.8
|
0.4
|
|
1915
|
37
|
12
|
49
|
25
|
7.0
|
50
|
3.5
|
0.4
|
|
1920
|
37
|
15
|
52
|
29
|
8.0
|
52
|
4.2
|
0.4
|
|
1925
|
38
|
19
|
56
|
33
|
6.2
|
55
|
3.4
|
0.5
|
|
1930
|
38
|
21
|
60
|
36
|
6.3
|
58
|
3.7
|
0.5
|
|
1935
|
38
|
24
|
62
|
39
|
6.5
|
60
|
3.9
|
0.5
|
|
1940
|
37
|
27
|
64
|
42
|
7.5
|
65
|
4.9
|
0.5
|
|
1945
|
37
|
31
|
68
|
46
|
8.7
|
70
|
6.1
|
0.5
|
|
1950
|
37
|
37
|
74
|
50
|
9.9
|
72
|
7.1
|
0.6
|
|
1955
|
38
|
43
|
81
|
53
|
11.1
|
75
|
8.3
|
0.6
|
|
1960
|
38
|
50
|
88
|
57
|
10.7
|
78
|
8.4
|
0.6
|
|
1965
|
38
|
57
|
95
|
60
|
9.3
|
80
|
7.4
|
0.6
|
|
1970
|
37
|
63
|
100
|
63
|
8.7
|
82
|
7.1
|
0.6
|
|
1975
|
37
|
68
|
105
|
65
|
8.5
|
85
|
7.2
|
0.6
|
|
1980
|
36
|
74
|
111
|
67
|
9.8
|
80
|
7.8
|
0.7
|
|
1985
|
36
|
80
|
116
|
69
|
9.9
|
74
|
7.3
|
0.8
|
|
1990
|
36
|
85
|
122
|
70
|
10.4
|
68
|
7.1
|
1.0
|
|
1995
|
38
|
90
|
128
|
70
|
10.0
|
63
|
6.3
|
1.1
|
|
2000
|
39
|
94
|
133
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Totals
|
165.8
|
66
|
110.0
|
11.4
|
Sources:
Population data: U.S. Bureau of the Census
Circumcision data: Wallerstein
1. 70% of the current
male population of the US have been circumcised.
2. 110 of the 166
million males (66%) born during the century underwent circumcision in
the newborn period.
3. The annual number of
circumcisions was highest between 1955 and 1965. During that decade, 1.8
million males were circumcised every year -- almost 5,000 every day.
4. Between 1915 and 1995
the intact male population remained in a very narrow band between 36 and
38 million, while the circumcised male population soared from 12 million
to 90 million.
5. A male born during
the century who remained intact in the newborn period had on average
about a one in five chance of being circumcised after the newborn
period, or a four in five probability of dying intact. That probability
fell steadily during the course of the century so that, if the current
post-newborn circumcision rate remains constant in the future, a male
born at the end of the century who escaped circumcision in the newborn
period nevertheless has less than a two in three chance of dying intact.
6. The model used to
produce these figures takes into account non-newborn circumcision rates,
the rate of immigration and the circumcision status of immigrants, and
the circumcision status of deaths and emigrants, all important factors
in arriving at the percentage of living males who have been circumcised.
Table
2: Number and Percentage of Living Males in USA in 2000
who have been Circumcised, by Age and Place of Birth
| |
Native Born
|
Foreign Born
|
Total
|
|
Age
|
Pop
(x1,000)
|
NC
(%)
|
LC
(%)
|
Circ’d
(%)
|
Circ’d
(x1,000)
|
Pop
(x1,000)
|
AC
(%)
|
PC
(%)
|
Circ’d
(%)
|
Circ’d
(x1,000)
|
Pop
(x1,000)
|
Circ’d
(x1,000)
|
Circ’d
(%)
|
| |
9,600
|
63
|
1
|
64
|
6,100
|
82
|
5
|
1
|
6
|
5
|
9,683
|
6,105
|
63
|
|
5- 9
|
9,975
|
68
|
1
|
69
|
6,915
|
233
|
15
|
2
|
17
|
39
|
10,208
|
6,954
|
68
|
|
10-14
|
9,548
|
74
|
2
|
76
|
7,225
|
464
|
25
|
3
|
28
|
128
|
10,012
|
7,354
|
73
|
|
15-19
|
9,395
|
80
|
2
|
82
|
7,674
|
756
|
25
|
4
|
29
|
216
|
10,151
|
7,890
|
78
|
|
20-24
|
8,176
|
85
|
2
|
87
|
7,073
|
1007
|
20
|
5
|
25
|
249
|
9,183
|
7,322
|
80
|
|
25-29
|
7,881
|
82
|
2
|
84
|
6,625
|
1174
|
15
|
6
|
21
|
246
|
9,055
|
6,871
|
76
|
|
30-34
|
8,316
|
80
|
3
|
83
|
6,865
|
1455
|
15
|
7
|
22
|
317
|
9,771
|
7,181
|
73
|
|
35-39
|
9,676
|
78
|
3
|
81
|
7,844
|
1539
|
15
|
8
|
23
|
347
|
11,216
|
8,191
|
73
|
|
40-44
|
9,677
|
75
|
4
|
79
|
7,624
|
1362
|
15
|
8
|
23
|
316
|
11,039
|
7,940
|
72
|
|
45-49
|
8,405
|
72
|
5
|
77
|
6,433
|
1096
|
15
|
9
|
24
|
262
|
9,501
|
6,695
|
70
|
|
50-54
|
7,129
|
70
|
5
|
75
|
5,360
|
869
|
15
|
9
|
24
|
213
|
7,998
|
5,572
|
70
|
|
55-59
|
5,537
|
65
|
6
|
71
|
3,953
|
646
|
15
|
10
|
25
|
162
|
6,183
|
4,115
|
67
|
|
60-64
|
4,443
|
60
|
8
|
68
|
3,007
|
525
|
15
|
11
|
26
|
134
|
4,968
|
3,141
|
63
|
|
65-69
|
3,926
|
58
|
8
|
66
|
2,608
|
410
|
15
|
11
|
26
|
107
|
4,337
|
2,715
|
63
|
|
70-74
|
3,543
|
55
|
9
|
64
|
2,282
|
318
|
15
|
12
|
27
|
85
|
3,862
|
2,367
|
61
|
|
80-84
|
1,680
|
50
|
11
|
61
|
1,029
|
134
|
15
|
13
|
28
|
37
|
1,814
|
1,066
|
59
|
|
85-89
|
759
|
42
|
13
|
55
|
421
|
88
|
15
|
13
|
28
|
25
|
847
|
445
|
53
|
|
90-94
|
264
|
35
|
15
|
50
|
133
|
43
|
15
|
14
|
29
|
12
|
307
|
146
|
47
|
|
95-99
|
61
|
30
|
17
|
47
|
29
|
15
|
15
|
14
|
29
|
4
|
76
|
33
|
44
|
|
100+
|
8
|
25
|
19
|
44
|
3
|
3
|
15
|
14
|
29
|
1
|
11
|
4
|
40
|
| |
120,802
|
72
|
4
|
75
|
90,955
|
12,473
|
16
|
8
|
24
|
2,968
|
133,279
|
93,923
|
70
|
Sources:
Population data: U.S. Bureau of the Census
Circumcision data: Wallerstein
NC = Circumcised in the
newborn period (neonatal circumcision)
LC = Circumcised after the newborn period (later circumcision)
AC = Circumcised prior to arrival in the USA
PC = Circumcised after arrival in the USA
1. Table 2 also shows
that 70% of the current male population of the US have been circumcised.
2. The figure for every
age group below the age of 90 is over 50%. Only the (very small and
rapidly diminishing number of) males born before 1910 have a better than
even chance of having retained their foreskins.
3. 87% of all 20-24yo
males born in US have been circumcised. From the differences in
circumcision rates by race, one can infer that over 90% of all 20-24yo
white males born in US have been circumcised.
Table
3: Changes in Male Population
by Circumcision Status between 1900 and 2000
|
(Figures in millions)
|
Intact
|
Circumcised
|
Total
|
|
Population in 1900
|
30
|
7
|
37
|
|
Births
|
56
|
(a) 110
|
166
|
|
Immigrants
|
20
|
(b) 5
|
25
|
|
Deaths and Emigrants
|
-56
|
-39
|
-95
|
|
– of population in 1900
|
-30
|
-7
|
-37
|
|
– of births and immigrants
|
-26
|
-32
|
-58
|
|
Switch in Status
|
-11
|
(c) 11
|
|
|
Population in 2000
|
39
|
94
|
133
|
(a) Newborn circumcisions
(b) Immigrants who arrived already having been circumcised
(c) Non-newborn circumcisions
Table 1 showed that the percentage of the
male population which has been circumcised has stabilized at 70%. The
factors which affect the figure, namely the newborn circumcision rate,
the non-newborn circumcision rate, the percentage of immigrant arrivals
who have been circumcised, and the percentage of deaths and emigrants
who have been circumcised are in balance. This is further illustrated by
Table 4.
Table
4: Estimated Changes in Male Population
by Circumcision Status between 2000 and 2001
|
(Figures
in thousands)
|
Intact
|
Circumcised
|
Total
|
Circumcised (%)
|
|
Population in 2000
|
39,356
|
93,293
|
133,279
|
70.47
|
|
Births
|
778
|
1,168
|
1,946
|
|
|
Immigrants
|
300
|
100
|
400
|
|
|
Deaths and Emigrants
|
-537
|
-742
|
-1,279
|
|
|
Switch in Status
|
-236
|
236
|
|
|
|
Population in 2001
|
39,661
|
94,685
|
134,346
|
70.48
|
1. Although the newborn
circumcision rate has fallen, this has not resulted so far in a fallen
in the percentage of living males who have been circumcised. Indeed,
that percentage is at an all time high.
2. The percentage of
living males who have been circumcised is a very sticky figure. Even if
the newborn circumcision rate were to fall dramatically, it would take
many decades for the generations of largely circumcised males to be
flushed from the statistics.
If the 20th century was ugly, the 21st
century will be uglier still unless Americans wake to the harm they are
doing to their kind.
If the population of the US grows in line
with projections by the US Census Bureau, and current rates of newborn
and non-newborn circumcision do not change, there will be 166 million
newborn circumcisions and 40 million non-newborn circumcisions in the US
in the 21st century.
It is less upsetting to focus on a
brighter scenario; a scenario in which the efforts of those campaigning
to bring an end to the stupid, barbaric custom bear fruit.
In this highly optimistic scenario, the
newborn circumcision rate begins immediately to fall to a similar level
as pertains in almost all the free and prosperous countries in the
world, reaching that level within a relatively short time span, while
the non-newborn rate falls at the same speed, in tandem with the newborn
rate.
Table
5: Projected Newborn Circumcision Rate
and Percentage of Living Males in the USA
who have been circumcised, 2000 to 2050
|
Year
|
Newborn
Circumcision
Rate (%)
|
Living Males
who have been
Circumcised (%)
|
|
2000
|
60
|
70
|
|
2005
|
50
|
70
|
|
2010
|
42
|
69
|
|
2015
|
35
|
67
|
|
2020
|
29
|
65
|
|
2025
|
24
|
62
|
|
2030
|
20
|
59
|
|
2035
|
17
|
55
|
|
2040
|
14
|
52
|
|
2045
|
12
|
48
|
|
2050
|
10
|
44
|
Assumptions:
1) US Census Bureau
projections of population change
2) Newborn circumcision
rate declines exponentially from 60% to 10% between 2000 and 2050
3) Non-newborn
circumcision rate declines exponentially from 6 per 1,000 per annum to 1
per 1,000 per annum between 2000 and 2050
1. Table 5 shows how
slowly the percentage of living males who have been circumcised will
decline, even as the newborn circumcision rate plummets. It is really
only from 2020 -- when the baby boomers start to get flushed out of the
statistics -- that the rate begins to decline significantly. While, in
this scenario, the newborn circumcision rate falls to 50% by 2005 and
continues to decline rapidly, it takes until 2043 for the percentage of
living males who have been circumcised to fall to 50%.
2. The absolute number
of circumcised living males reaches a high water mark of 100,000,000 in
2011 and remains at that level (rounded to the nearest million) until
2025 inclusive. In the same way that all the factors combined to keep
the intact population more or less constant during the 20th century,
they now all combine to keep the circumcised population constant (while
the intact population increases).
Table
6: Projected Changes in U.S. Male Population
by Circumcision Status between 2000 and 2050
|
(Figures in millions)
|
Intact
|
Circumcised
|
Total
|
|
Population in 2000
|
39
|
94
|
133
|
|
Births
|
83
|
30
|
113
|
|
Immigrants
|
18
|
6
|
24
|
|
Deaths and Emigrants
|
-23
|
-54
|
-77
|
|
Switch in Status
|
-8
|
8
|
|
|
Population in 2050
|
109
|
84
|
193
|
In this scenario compared
with the status quo, 46 million males will have been spared the loss of
their foreskins by 2050, and 143 million by 2100.
|